Nevada Revised Statutes § 200.050 makes it a category B felony to commit voluntary manslaughter, which is the intentional and unlawful killing of a human being with no malice or premeditation. Voluntary manslaughter is committed in a sudden “heat of passion” triggered by a serious provocation that would drive a reasonable person to irresistible passion.
Elements
- Lack of Malice or Premeditation: The lethal act occurs suddenly with no time to plan or deliberate.
- Enough Provocation: There must be either:
- a serious and highly provoking injury inflicted upon the person killing, sufficient to excite an irresistible passion in a reasonable person, or
- an attempt by the person killed to commit a serious personal injury on the person killing.
- The Reasonable Person Standard: The provocation must be strong enough to prompt an ordinary person to abandon control of their actions.
Penalties
- Incarceration: 1 to 10 years in Nevada State Prison.
- Fines: Up to $10,000 (at the court’s discretion).
- Probation: The court may grant probation instead of prison.
- Loss of Gun Rights: Convicted felons may not own or possess firearms.
Defenses
- Self-Defense: The killer was acting under a reasonable fear of imminent death or great bodily harm.
- Insanity: The killing occurred while the killer was in a delusional state that prevented them from realizing what they were doing or that it was unlawful.
- Accident: The killing occurred by misadventure with no criminal intent.
In our experience, voluntary manslaughter cases are rarely as straightforward as the initial police reports suggest. Many involve rapidly unfolding confrontations, conflicting witness accounts, questions about whether the defendant acted in the heat of passion or in lawful self-defense, and forensic evidence that takes time to develop fully.
We encourage clients to avoid assuming that the charge filed at arrest will ultimately be the charge that resolves the case. A careful investigation and early legal advocacy can significantly affect both the charges and the outcome.
In this article, our Las Vegas criminal defense attorneys will address in detail the following key issues regarding voluntary manslaughter:
- 1. Elements of NRS 200.050
- 2. Penalties
- 3. Defenses
- 4. Record Seals
- 5. Deportation
- 6. Related Offenses
- Frequently-Asked-Questions
- Additional Reading
1. Elements of NRS 200.050
For you to be convicted of voluntary manslaughter in Nevada, prosecutors have to prove beyond a reasonable doubt the following two elements:
- You intentionally killed someone; and
- Either of the following conditions occurred just prior to the killing:
- There was a serious and highly provoking injury inflicted upon you, sufficient to excite an irresistible passion in a reasonable person, or
- There was an attempt by the person killed to commit a serious personal injury on you.1
The classic example of voluntary manslaughter is when a husband unknowingly walks in on his wife in bed with someone else, and the husband promptly pounces on the other man and fatally wounds him “in the heat of passion.” Being betrayed by a life partner is one of the most painful human experiences, and any reasonable person might feel an immediate violent impulse.2
What makes voluntary manslaughter a less serious charge than first-degree murder is that first-degree murder requires premeditation and deliberation. Even if only a few seconds pass between the provocation and the killing, a jury may decide that you “cooled off” and had the mental ability to premeditate murder.3
Example: Charlie walks into his bedroom and is shocked to find his wife in bed with another man. Charlie then runs to his closet, takes out his pistol, loads it, and shoots the other man. In this case, Charlie would likely be liable for murder rather than manslaughter because getting and loading a gun shows premeditation.
Had Charlie been holding a loaded gun when he walked in on his wife cheating and then immediately shot the boyfriend, Charlie might be able to avoid murder charges. This is because there would have been no cooling-off period between discovering the betrayal and pulling the trigger.
Depending on the case, it may be possible to get murder charges reduced to voluntary manslaughter as part of a plea bargain.
2. Penalties
Nevada law classifies voluntary manslaughter as a category B felony. If you are convicted, the court will impose a prison sentence of one to 10 years and possibly a fine of up to $10,000.
It may be possible to persuade the judge to grant probation instead of some or all of the prison sentence. In the voluntary manslaughter cases we see, probation typically involves:
- house arrest;
- electronic monitoring;
- abstaining from drugs and alcohol; and
- regular check-ins with the probation officer.
Note that any felony conviction will cause you to lose your right to own or possess a firearm. The only way to get firearm rights restored in Nevada is through a Governor’s Pardon.4
3. Defenses
Here at Las Vegas Defense Group, we have represented countless people accused of homicide, including voluntary manslaughter. In our experience, the following three defenses have been very effective with prosecutors, juries, and judges at getting NRS 200.050 charges dropped or reduced.
1) You Acted in Lawful Self-Defense
Nevada law permits you to kill to protect yourself or others from imminent death or great bodily harm.
Example: Alice and Betty are strippers. A drunk patron is angry that Alice and Betty will not let him touch them. The patron then takes out his gun and points it towards Alice while screaming obscenities. Fearful for her and Betty’s lives, Alice immediately kicks the patron in the throat with her stiletto, killing him. Alice should not face homicide charges because she reasonably believed their lives were in imminent danger.
Note that self-defense applies only when you are acting reasonably under the circumstances. Had the patron in the above example not flashed a weapon, Alice would not have been justified in killing him.5
2) You Were Legally Insane
If you are accused of voluntary manslaughter, you may be found “not guilty by reason of insanity” if you were in a delusional state that prevented you from either:
- knowing or understanding the nature and capacity of your act or
- appreciating that your conduct was unlawful.6
This defense may be effective if you had severe mental illness, such as schizophrenia or bipolar disorder:
Example: Jeff has been diagnosed with bipolar disorder. One day while his caretaker is helping him walk upstairs, the caretaker loses his patience at Jeff’s manic state and screams, “Good God, why don’t you just kill me now and end my suffering!”
Taking his caretaker at his word, Jeff immediately pushes him down the stairs. In light of Jeff’s mental illness, a Nevada court would probably find that Jeff did not appreciate that his conduct was unlawful. Therefore, Jeff would probably escape a homicide conviction.
Note that if you are acquitted of homicide by reason of insanity, you will likely be committed to a mental institution.
Also note that it does not qualify as insanity if you were voluntarily intoxicated.7
3) The Incident Was an Accident
Deaths that result from innocent accidents are not criminal. Unless you were acting negligently at the time of the killing, you should not face homicide charges for causing an accident.8
Example: Nick is beating his girlfriend Dana at their home. At one point, Dana manages to duck when Nick tries to headbutt her. However, this causes Nick to fall forward and hit his head on the marble floor, killing him.
Even though Dana was acting in the heat of the moment, she should not face manslaughter charges. Nick falling forward to his death was an unforeseeable accident and should not invite criminal prosecution.
No matter the circumstances, prosecutors in criminal cases have the burden to prove guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. As long as we can demonstrate that the D.A.’s evidence is too unreliable or inadequate to sustain a conviction, the court should drop the charges.9
4. Record Seals
In Nevada, a voluntary manslaughter conviction can be sealed 10 years after the case closes.10 A case is “closed” after the entire sentence has been served, including parole and probation.
If the NRS 200.050 charge gets dismissed, then you can petition for a record seal immediately.11
We always recommend that clients pursue a record seal as soon as they are eligible. Having a clean background check greatly improves employment, educational, and housing prospects.
5. Deportation
Voluntary manslaughter is a crime involving moral turpitude and is therefore deportable.12 Non-citizens arrested for any homicide charge are advised to retain a lawyer right away to try to get the case dismissed or reduced to a non-deportable offense.
6. Related Offenses
| Nevada Homicide Offenses | Main Elements |
| First-degree murder (NRS 200.030) | Premeditated killing with malice aforethought. |
| Second-degree murder (NRS 200.030) | An unintentional killing with malice aforethought caused by behavior so reckless you should have known that death would likely result. |
| Felony-murder (NRS 200.030) | A killing that occurs during the commission of either arson, robbery, burglary, home invasion, kidnapping, child abuse, elder abuse, sexual abuse of a child, and/or rape. |
| Involuntary Manslaughter (NRS 200.070) | Unintentional killing through negligence. |
| Attempted Murder (NRS 200.030) | Trying to kill someone but failing. |
| Capital Murder (NRS 200.033) | First-degree murder when there is at least one aggravating circumstance that outweighs any mitigating ones. |
| Vehicular Manslaughter (NRS 484B.657) | Killing someone by negligent driving. |
| Vehicular Homicide (NRS 484C.130) | Causing a fatal DUI following at least three prior DUI convictions. |
| Feticide (NRS 200.210) | Killing an unborn child outside of a licensed abortion clinic. |
| Death by Drugs (NRS 453.333) | Unlawfully giving someone drugs that cause their death. |
Note that voluntary manslaughter is also a crime under federal law under 18 U.S. Code § 1112. It carries up to 15 years in prison, which is five years more than the maximum penalty in Nevada.
Depending on the case, you can be prosecuted in both federal court and Nevada court for the same voluntary manslaughter allegation without “double jeopardy” being implicated. In our experience, however, defendants are usually prosecuted only in state or federal court.
Frequently-Asked-Questions
Can a murder charge be reduced to voluntary manslaughter in Nevada?
Yes. If the evidence shows the killing occurred in the heat of passion after legally adequate provocation rather than with malice and deliberation, prosecutors may reduce a murder charge to voluntary manslaughter or a jury may convict of voluntary manslaughter instead of murder. Whether the reduction is appropriate depends on the specific facts and whether prosecutors can prove murder beyond a reasonable doubt.
In our experience, this is one of the most heavily litigated issues in Nevada homicide cases. We often focus on whether the evidence truly shows premeditation or whether the killing occurred during an overwhelming emotional event that the law recognizes as adequate provocation. In many cases, that distinction can mean the difference between a murder conviction and a significantly less severe offense.
Does simply being angry qualify as “heat of passion” under NRS 200.050?
No. Nevada law requires a serious and highly provoking injury or attempted serious personal injury that would cause an irresistible passion in a reasonable person. Mere anger, jealousy, insults, arguments, or hurt feelings are generally not enough by themselves to reduce murder to voluntary manslaughter.
We often see defendants in court who believe any emotionally charged killing is automatically voluntary manslaughter. In fact, the law applies an objective “reasonable person” standard, and prosecutors frequently argue that the provocation was legally insufficient.
Can words alone constitute adequate provocation in Nevada?
Generally, no. Offensive language, insults, or verbal arguments alone rarely amount to the legally sufficient provocation required for voluntary manslaughter. Courts instead look for conduct that would cause a reasonable person to lose self-control immediately.
In our experience, prosecutors often emphasize that a defendant had opportunities to walk away rather than react violently. We examine exactly what occurred before the incident because physical actions, threats, and timing often matter much more than what was merely said.
What is a “cooling-off period” in a Nevada voluntary manslaughter case?
If enough time passes between the provocation and the killing for a reasonable person’s passions to cool, the killing generally no longer qualifies as voluntary manslaughter. The longer the delay—and the more opportunity for reflection—the more likely prosecutors will argue the killing was committed with malice rather than in the heat of passion.
From what we have seen, investigators frequently build timelines using surveillance video, cell phone records, witness testimony, and forensic evidence. Even a relatively short period of time can become a major issue if the prosecution argues it gave the defendant an opportunity to deliberate.
Can I claim both self-defense and voluntary manslaughter?
Sometimes. A defendant may argue that the killing was justified because they reasonably acted in self-defense while also arguing that, if the jury rejects self-defense, the evidence supports voluntary manslaughter rather than murder. Which defenses are appropriate in Nevada depends on the facts and the available evidence.
In our experience, homicide defenses are often presented in the alternative. We evaluate every viable legal theory because the strongest strategy may involve challenging the prosecution on multiple fronts instead of relying on a single defense.
Can the judge grant probation for voluntary manslaughter in Nevada?
Yes. Although voluntary manslaughter is punishable by one to ten years in Nevada State Prison, the statute does not expressly prohibit probation. In some cases, a district court may suspend the sentence and grant probation if the defendant is otherwise eligible under Nevada law. If the court imposes imprisonment, however, the minimum prison term is one year.
Our clients sometimes believe that a conviction automatically requires prison. Sentencing is often more nuanced, and probation eligibility is a real possibility, especially if there is mitigating evidence.
Can voluntary manslaughter be based on mistaken beliefs?
Potentially. The issue is whether the defendant actually acted in the heat of passion caused by legally sufficient provocation. Depending on the circumstances in Nevada, disputes over what the defendant reasonably perceived can become central issues for the jury.
In our experience, eyewitnesses often remember emotionally charged events differently. We review surveillance footage, forensic evidence, and witness statements to determine whether the prosecution’s version accurately reflects what actually happened in the moments leading to the death.
Will a voluntary manslaughter conviction affect my gun rights and immigration status?
Yes. A voluntary manslaughter conviction is a felony that generally results in the loss of firearm rights under Nevada and federal law. It may also trigger severe immigration consequences, including removal proceedings or inadmissibility for non-citizens, depending on the circumstances of the case.
From what we have seen, the collateral consequences of a felony conviction often last much longer than any prison sentence. We consider the impact on immigration status, firearm rights, employment opportunities, and professional licensing when evaluating potential plea offers.
Additional Reading
For more in-depth information, refer to these scholarly articles:
- Are There Circumstances Other than Provocation which May Reduce Murder to Voluntary Manslaughter – Kentucky Law Journal.
- What Future for Voluntary Manslaughter? – The Journal of Criminal Law.
- Manslaughter and the Adequacy of Provocation: The Reasonableness of the Reasonable Man – University of Pennsylvania Law Review.
- The psychology and law of voluntary manslaughter: what can psychology research teach us about the “heat of passion” defense? – Behavior Decision Making.
- Some Provoking Aspects of Voluntary Manslaughter Law – Common Law World Review.
See our related articles: Manslaughter v. Murder – The Law in Nevada and Justifiable Homicide under NRS 200.120.
Legal References
- NRS 200.040 – “Manslaughter” defined.
1. In cases of voluntary manslaughter, there must be a serious and highly provoking injury inflicted upon the person killing, sufficient to excite an irresistible passion in a reasonable person, or an attempt by the person killed to commit a serious personal injury on the person killing.
2. Voluntary manslaughter does not include vehicular manslaughter as described in NRS 484B.657.NRS 200.050 – “Voluntary manslaughter” defined.
1. In cases of voluntary manslaughter, there must be a serious and highly provoking injury inflicted upon the person killing, sufficient to excite an irresistible passion in a reasonable person, or an attempt by the person killed to commit a serious personal injury on the person killing.
2. Voluntary manslaughter does not include vehicular manslaughter as described in NRS 484B.657.
Newson v. State (2020) 462 P.3d 246. Hancock v. State (1964) 80 Nev. 581 (“The crime of manslaughter does not require the specific intent to kill…”). NRS 200.080. - Roberts v. State (1986) 102 Nev. 170 (“The crime of voluntary manslaughter is defined and described in NRS 200.040, NRS 200.050 and NRS 200.060, the pertinent language being set forth in the margin. It appears that there is some evidence in this case to support a jury finding that the crime of manslaughter had been committed. Indeed, the trial judge himself observed that the jury could have inferred that the defendant was acting in the heat of passion. That there is evidence to support a finding of the “sudden” nature of the passion cannot be gainsaid. NRS 200.040 requires that the “sudden heat of passion” be caused by “a provocation apparently sufficient to make the passion irresistible.” NRS 200.050 additionally defines sufficient provocation in terms of a “serious and highly provoking injury inflicted upon the person killing.”…As indicated, the defendant and the victim had a long-standing relationship. He continued after their separation to provide her with financial support and to see her romantically. He said that he considered the victim and her children to be his family. The day of the killing was to a large degree dedicated to her convenience. He had taken a half day off from his job to furnish her son with a truck. He ran an errand for her and expected to spend that evening with her. He would have been justified in viewing her “standing him up” as a callused insult, greatly aggravated by her taking up sexually with another man on the night of his planned get-together with her. It is not unreasonable to infer from such circumstances that his discovery provoked him into a sudden and excessive anger or “heat of passion,” as the statute reads.”). See State v. Fisko (1937) 58 Nev. 65, 70 P.2d 1113 (“It is not every assault that reduces murder to manslaughter…And the provocation must be great where a deadly weapon is used.”). Curry v. State (1990) 106 Nev. 317 (“By definition, [violating NRS 200.050] is a general intent crime. One cannot logically specifically intend to act pursuant to a spontaneous, unanticipated and therefore, truly irresistible passion. An “attempt,” as defined in NRS 193.153, is a specific intent crime. The accused must formulate a specific intent to commit the crime attempted. See Bailey v. State (1984) 100 Nev. 562. We further defined the intent necessary for an attempted crime in Keys v. State, (1988) 104 Nev. 736, 766 P.2d 270, when we stated: An attempt, by nature, is a failure to accomplish what one intended to do. Attempt means to try; it means an effort to bring about the desired result. Thus one cannot attempt to be negligent or attempt to have the general malignant recklessness contemplated by the legal concept, “implied malice” (emphasis in original). Id. at 740, 766 P.2d at 273. The crime of attempted voluntary manslaughter is therefore an illogical illusion.”).
- NRS 200.060 >When killing punished as murder.
The killing must be the result of that sudden, violent impulse of passion supposed to be irresistible; for, if there should appear to have been an interval between the assault or provocation given and the killing, sufficient for the voice of reason and humanity to be heard, the killing shall be attributed to deliberate revenge and punished as murder.
Collins v. State (2017) 405 P.3d 657 (“It may be questioned whether [violating NRS 200.050] qualifies under the elements test as a lesser-included offense of murder, given that murder does not have as one of its elements the provocation and passion voluntary manslaughter requires. But…existing case law…treats voluntary manslaughter as a lesser-included offense of murder.”); Allen v. State (1982) 98 Nev. 354 (“Voluntary manslaughter is defined by NRS 200.050 and NRS 200.060. It consists of a killing which is the result of a sudden, violent and irresistible impulse of passion. The law requires that the irresistible impulse of passion be caused by a serious and highly provoking injury, or attempted injury, sufficient to excite such passion in a reasonable person. If there is an interval between the provocation and the killing sufficient for the passion to cool and the voice of reason to be heard, the killing will be punished as murder. Jackson v. State, (1968) 84 Nev. 203 (“Whether the interval between the provocation and the killing is sufficient for the passions of a reasonable person to cool is not measured exclusively by any precise time. What constitutes a sufficient cooling-off period also depends upon the magnitude of the provocation and the degree to which passions are aroused…The distance between the scene of the fight at the pickup truck to Jackson’s car to which he walked after he was knocked to the ground by England and the time it took to go there, remove the rifle from his automobile, load and fire it, rules out the sudden irresistible impulse that makes up voluntary manslaughter.”). Graves v. State (1968) 84 Nev. 262, 439 P.2d 476 (“…this court has held that a trial court is justified in refusing to give an instruction on the crime of manslaughter if there is no evidence to support such an instruction…The presence of malice precludes an instruction on the crime of manslaughter.”). - NRS 200.080 – Punishment for voluntary manslaughter. (“A person convicted of the crime of voluntary manslaughter is guilty of a category B felony and shall be punished by imprisonment in the state prison for a minimum term of not less than 1 year and a maximum term of not more than 10 years, and may be further punished by a fine of not more than $10,000.”). NRS 176A.100 – Authority and discretion of court to suspend sentence and grant probation; persons eligible; enhanced supervision; submission of report of presentence investigation. NRS 202.350 – Ownership or possession of firearm by certain persons prohibited; penalties.
- Hill v. State (1982) 98 Nev. 295 (“The California Supreme Court held that if a defendant entertained an honest, but unreasonable, belief in the necessity of self-defense, at most he could be convicted only of manslaughter, since such a belief is inconsistent with and negates malice, an element of murder. We reject this “imperfect self-defense” theory because, unlike California’s statutory scheme, NRS 200.040 and NRS 200.050 provide an express restriction on the situations giving rise to voluntary manslaughter.”).
- Finger v. State (2001) 117 Nev. 548 (“In order to be considered legally insane under M’Naghten, a defendant must labor under a delusion so great that he is incapable of appreciating his surroundings. This delusion must do one of two things: (1) rob the defendant of the ability to understand what he is doing; or (2) deprive the defendant of the ability to appreciate that his action is wrong, that is, not authorized by law.”).
- State v. Fisko (1937) 58 Nev. 65 (“While the authorities are not all agreed, the great weight thereof in this country is to the effect that mere intoxication cannot reduce murder to manslaughter.”).
- See NRS 200.010–060.
- NRS 175.191.
- NRS 179.245.
- NRS 179.255.
- INA § 237(a)(2)(A).